| Fooling
Around the World:
The History of the Jester
(from Chapter 1: Facets of the Fool and Chapter 7: Stultorum Plena
Sunt Omnia, or Fools Are Everywhere)
"Who Is Not a Fool?" ["Qui non stultus?"]
—Horace (65-8 B.C.), Satires, 2.3.158
Then come jesters, musicians and trained dwarfs,
And singing girls from the land of Ti-ti,
To delight the ear and eye
And bring mirth to the mind.
—Sima Xiangru (ca. 179-117 B.C.), Rhapsody on the Shanglin Park
The jester is an elusive character. The European words used to denote
him can now seem as nebulous as they are numerous, reflecting the
mercurial man behind them: fool, buffoon, clown, jongleur, jogleor,
joculator, sot, stultor, scurra, fou, fol, truhan, mimus, histrio,
morio. He can be any of these, while the German word Narr is not so
much a stem as the sturdy trunk of a tree efflorescent with fool vocabulary.
The jester's quicksilver qualities are equally difficult to pin down,
but nevertheless not beyond definition.
The Chinese terms used for "jester" now seem vaguer than
the European, most of them having a wider meaning of "actor"
or "entertainer." In Chinese there is no direct translation
of the English "jester," no single word that to the present-day
Chinese conjures an image as vividly as "court jester,"
fou du roi, or Hofnarr would to a Westerner. In Chinese the jester
element often has to be singled out according to context, although
the key character you does seem to have referred specifically to jesters,
originally meaning somebody who would use humor to mock and joke,
who could speak without causing offense, and who also had the ability
to sing or dance: "The you was also allowed a certain privilege,
that is, his 'words were without offence' . . . but the you could
not offer his remonstrances in earnest, he had to make use of jokes,
songs and dance." The term is often combined with other characters
giving differing shades to his jesterdom, an acting or a musical slant,
for example: paiyou, youren, youling, changyou, lingren, linglun.
All could include musical and other talents, chang suggesting music,
ling, playing or fooling, and pai a humorous element to bring delight.
Several of these terms are too frequently translated as "actor"
regardless of where they appear on the etymological chain of evolution
and even though they were used long before the advent of Chinese drama.
Perhaps the earliest antecedents of the European court jester were
the comic actors of ancient Rome. Several Latin terms used in medieval
references to jesters (including numerous church condemnations of
them), such as scurrae, mimi, or histriones, originally referred either
to amusing hangers-on or to the comic actors and entertainers of Rome.
Just as there is now no clear distinction between the terms for "actor"
and "jester" in Chinese, so the Latin terms could merge
the two. If there was no formal professional jester in Rome, the comic
actors fulfilled his functions, sometimes even bearing a striking
physical resemblance to what is usually considered a medieval and
Renaissance archetype. With periodic imperial purges against actors
for their outspokenness, many of them took to the road and fanned
out across the empire in search of new audiences and greater freedom.
Successive waves of such wandering comics may well have laid the foundations
for medieval and Renaissance jesterdom, possibly contributing to the
rising tide of folly worship that swept across the Continent from
the late Middle Ages.
An individual court jester in Europe could emerge from a wide range
of backgrounds: an erudite but nonconformist university dropout, a
monk thrown out of a priory for nun frolics, a jongleur with exceptional
verbal or physical dexterity, or the apprentice of a village blacksmith
whose fooling amused a passing nobleman. Just as a modern-day television
stand-up comedian might begin his career on the pub and club circuit,
so a would-be jester could make it big time in court if he was lucky
enough to be spotted. In addition, a poet, musician, or scholar could
also become a court jester.
The recruiting of jesters was tremendously informal and meritocratic,
perhaps indicating greater mobility and fluidity in past society than
is often supposed. A man with the right qualifications might be found
anywhere: in Russia "they were generally selected from among
the older and uglier of the serf-servants, and the older the fool
or she-fool was, the droller they were supposed and expected to be.
The fool had the right to sit at table with his master, and say whatever
came into his head." Noblemen might keep an eye out for potential
jesters, and a letter dated 26 January 1535/36 from Thomas Bedyll
to Thomas Cromwell (ca. 1485-1540) recommends a possible replacement
for the king's old jester:
Ye know the Kinges grace hath one old fole: Sexten as good as myght
be whiche because of aige is not like to cotinew. I haue spied one
yong fole at Croland whiche in myne opinion shalbe muche mor pleasaunt
than euer Sexten was . . . and he is not past xv yere old.
Fuller's History of the Worthies of England (1662) gives an account
of the recruiting of Tarlton, jester to Elizabeth I (r. 1558-1603),
that further illustrates this informality:
Here he was in the field, keeping his Father's Swine, when a Servant
of Robert Earl of Leicester . . . was so highly pleased with his happy
unhappy answers, that he brought him to Court, where he became the
most famous Jester to Queen Elizabeth.
A dwarf-jester called Nai Teh (Mr. Little) at the court of King Mongkut
of Siam (r. 1851-68), described by Anna Leonowens in Anna and the
King of Siam, was similarly recruited:
He was discovered by one of the King's half-brothers on a hunting
trip into the north and brought to Bangkok to be trained in athletic
and gymnastic tricks. When he had learned these, he was presented
to the king as a comedian and a buffoon.
A German, Paul Wüst, declined an offer of a post as jester with
the sort of brazen dismissiveness that explains why he was asked.
When Duke Eberhard the Bearded of Würtemburg (1445-96) invited
him to be his jester he replied, "My father sired his own fool;
if you want one too, then go and sire one for yourself" ("Mein
Vater hat einen Narren für sich gezeugt, willst du aber einen
Narren haben, so zeuge dir auch einen"). The same story is attributed
to Will Somers, who uses the joke to mock Henry's predilection for
chalking up wives:
His Majesty after some discourse growing into some good liking of
him, said; fellow, wilt thou be my fool? who answered him again, that
he had rather be his own father's still, then the king asking him
why? he told him again, that his father had got him a fool for himself,
(having but one wife) and no body could justly claim him from him:
now you have had so many wives, and still living in hope to have more,
why, of some one of them, cannot you get a fool as he did? and so
you shall be sure to have a fool of your own.
The post of court jester might also appeal to somebody in need of
a safe haven. The thirteenth-century French tale of Robert le Diable
has him fleeing a populace baying for blood and forcing his way past
the footmen to gain access to the emperor, who duly takes him under
his wing as a jester, saying that nobody should be allowed to beat
him. Alfred de Musset's play Fantasio (1834) is about a dandy whose
job as jester allows him to escape and evade creditors, and a Scottish
miscellany tells us how one of the most roguish historical jesters
found his vocation:
Archie Armstrong . . . after having long distinguished himself as
a most dexterous sheep-stealer, and when Eskdale at last became too
hot for him, on account of his nefarious practices, he had the honour
of being appointed jester to James I. of England, which office he
held for several years.
Tarlton tended pigs, Archy stole sheep, and Claus Hinsse (d. 1599),
jester to Duke Johann Friedrich of Pomerania (d. 1600), began his
working life as a cowherd. Wamba, "son of Witless," the
jester in Sir Walter Scott's Ivanhoe, was, like Tarlton, a swineherd,
and Claus Narr (Fool), one of Germany's most famous and long-serving
jesters, was tending geese when he was recruited. He was jester to
four Saxon electors and one archbishop during the last quarter of
the fifteenth century and first quarter of the sixteenth, and there
are more than six hundred stories about him. One day when the first
of his patrons, Elector Ernst (d. 1486), was traveling through Ranstadt
with a lot of horses and wagons, Claus became curious about all the
commotion and went to see what was happening. Worried that his geese
would be stolen, he secured the goslings by putting their necks through
his belt while he carried the older geese under his arms. When Ernst
saw him he laughed at his simplicity and decided he was a born jester.
He asked Claus's father's permission to take him to court:
"That would be great, Sir! I'd be relieved of a great encumbrance
thereby; the youth is no good to me—he makes nothing but trouble
in my house and stirs up the whole village with his pranks."
["Sehr gern, Gnädiger Herr, ich würde dadurch eines
grossen Verdrusses überhoben, denn der Junge ist mir nichts nütze,
in meinem Hause macht er nichts als Unruh, und durch seine Possen
wiegelt er dass ganze Dorf auf."]
Ernst then gave Claus's father twenty guilders as compensation for
the strangled goslings and other gifts besides. The story is an insight
into the charitable element often involved in the recruiting of "naturals."
To a poor family, a natural might be a heavy burden, and it could
clearly be a relief to have him taken in and looked after by a wealthy
family. Generally speaking there is little to suggest that this was
not done in a humane and kindly manner, although in England there
was a law allowing the estates of a natural to be handed over to a
person offering to care for him, which could lead to their being recruited
under false pretenses.
A similar story is told of Jamie Fleeman (1713-78), the Scottish jester
to the laird of Udny. He complemented his jesting duties with those
of a cowherd and goose guardian, and when he one day grew irritated
by the geese wandering willy-nilly, he twisted some straw rope around
their necks and started walking home, unaware that they were being
throttled one by one. By the time he realized it was too late, and
since it was a rare breed of geese, he would have been in big trouble.
So he dragged the corpses into the poultry yard and stuffed their
throats with food. When asked whether the geese were safe and sound,
he replied cheerfully, "Safe! they're gobble, gobble, gobblin'
as if they had nae seen meat for a twalmonth! Safe! Ise warran' they're
safe aneuch, if they hae nae choked themsells."
In India the same entrance requirements prevailed: make me laugh and
you're in. Tenali Rama, one of the three superstar jesters of India,
is said to have earned his position as jester by making King Krsnadevaraya
laugh. According to one story, he contrived for the king's guru to
carry him around on his shoulders within sight of the king. Outraged
at the humiliation of his holy man, the king sent some guards out
to beat the man riding on the guru's shoulders. Tenali Rama, smelling
impending danger, jumped down and begged forgiveness of the guru,
insisting that to make amends he should carry him on his own shoulders.
The guru agreed, and when the guards arrived the guru was duly beaten.
The king found the trick amusing enough to appoint Tenali Rama his
jester. In China, despite the abundance of anecdotes about jesters
once they enter royal service, there is very little background information
available. Nevertheless the universal jester skills displayed by the
Chinese jesters suggest that their appointment was as meritocratic
as in Europe.
A description of Rabelais's Panurge encompasses many of the jester's
characteristics: "Irreverent, libertine, self-indulgent, witty,
clever, roguish, he is the fool as court jester, the fool as companion,
the fool as goad to the wise and challenge to the virtuous, the fool
as critic of the world." He could be juggler, confidant, scapegoat,
prophet, and counselor all in one. If we follow his family tree along
its many branches we encounter musicians and actors, acrobats and
poets, dwarfs, hunchbacks, tricksters, madmen, and mountebanks.
A Cavalcade of Cavorting Fools
Foolery, sir, does walk about the orb like the sun, it shines everywhere.
—William Shakespeare, Twelfth Night (3.1.39-40)
We have all seen how an appropriate and well-timed joke can sometimes
influence even grim tyrants. . . . The most violent tyrants put up
with their clowns and fools, though these often made them the butt
of open insults.
—Desiderius Erasmus, Praise of Folly
The court jester is a universal phenomenon. He crops up in every court
worth its salt in medieval and Renaissance Europe, in China, India,
Japan, Russia, America and Africa. A cavalcade of jesters tumble across
centuries and continents, and one could circle the globe tracing their
footsteps. But to China the laurels. China has undoubtedly the longest,
richest, and most thoroughly documented history of court jesters.
From Twisty Pole and Baldy Chunyu to Moving Bucket and Newly Polished
Mirror, it boasts perhaps more of the brightest stars in the jester
firmament than any other country, spanning a far wider segment of
time. The jester's decline began with the rise of the stage actor
as the Chinese theater became fully established during the Yuan dynasty.
In many respects actors seem to have taken up the jester's baton not
only in entertaining their patrons, but also in offering criticism
and advice no less clear for being couched in wit. Perhaps only in
ancient Rome did jesters and actors overlap so much.
In comparison with those of China, the numerous jesters of Europe,
although flourishing for some four hundred years, are something of
a dazzling display of shooting stars. Perhaps because the European
court jesters were so inextricably linked with the tradition of folly
that straddled the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, their time was
relatively short-lived, and they died out more or less as the fashion
for folly faded. But for as long as they lasted, which was no mere
blip, their influence permeated court life. It is a common belief
that Europe was the center of the court jester's cosmos, providing
the control against which other jesters, such as they are, may be
measured. Yet in a sense Europe is the exception rather than the rule,
precisely because the fortunes of the European court jesters rose
and fell with the tsunami-scale wave of medieval and Renaissance fool
mania that engulfed the Continent. The concept of folly with all its
variegated hues permeated Europe at all levels for several centuries,
and it is against this backdrop of colorful and often contradictory
manifestations of "folly" that the European jester must
be seen. There were certainly jesters before the tidal wave began
to swell, but it is on its crest that we see them come surfing in.
Although the jester died out as a court institution (if not as a function),
about the sixteenth or seventeenth century in China and the early
eighteenth in Europe, there have been pockets of resistance to his
demise. European homes less grand than those of kings and prelates
harbored jesters for a century or two longer than the courts, a domestic
jester being recorded at Hilton Castle in county Durham in the eighteenth
century and a Scottish jester, Shemus Anderson (d. 1833), at Murthley
Castle, Perthshire. The Queen Mother's family, the Bowes-Lyons, was
"the last Scottish family to maintain a full-time jester."
A history of the manor of Gawsworth describes a Samuel Johnson (1691-1773)
as "one of the last of the paid English jesters. . . . In addition
to his being employed as jester or mirth-maker by the manorial Lord
of Gawsworth, he was a welcome addition at parties given by the neighbouring
country families, when he had free license to bandy his witticisms,
and to utter and enact anything likely to enliven the company, and
to provoke mirth and laughter."
In Persia the autocratic Shah Naseredin (r. 1848-96) had all his courtiers
quaking except the jester Karim Shir'ei, whose name means "opium
addict" but also implies someone of lazy or sleepy demeanor.
Karim Shir'ei would ridicule the whole court, including the shah.
Once the shah asked whether there was a shortage of food, and the
jester said "Yes, I see Your Majesty is eating only five times
a day." One member of the shah's entourage had the title Saheb
Ekhtiyar ("Authorized" [by the shah]). When they were out
traveling Karim Shir'ei's donkey stopped at a gate, and the jokester
found a pretext to mock the courtier by addressing the ass: "If
you want to stop you are Saheb Ekhtiyar [authorized], and if you want
to go ahead, you are also Saheb Ekhtiyar [authorized]." Like
many famous jesters before him, his name is still used as a peg for
jibes and jokes.
Perhaps the most recent examples of the court jester are among the
ritual clowns of African and American tribes whose mocking, corrective,
and unbridled topsy-turvy antics have been documented by twentieth-century
anthropologists. These are not all strictly speaking court jesters,
in that they do not usually serve one master, belonging more to the
whole tribe or village. Also, their license is often limited to specific
periods, although during such festivals or rituals their freedoms
and duties accord with those of the permanently privileged jester.
However, there are some tribes that have had permanently appointed
jesters, such as the African Wolof jesters and the Sioux "contrary,"
or heyhoka, and "jesters . . . were also attached to many African
monarchs. They were frequently dwarfs, and other oddities; and their
duties included besides the playing of jokes, the singing of the praises
of their rulers. . . . 'But it must not be thought that these bards
were mere flatterers . . . they also had licence to make sharp criticisms.'"
The court jester is universal not merely in having been at home in
such diverse cultures and eras, but also in taking his pick from the
same ragbag of traits and talents no matter when or where he occurs.
Above all he used humor, whether in the form of wit, puns, riddles,
doggerel verse, songs, capering antics, or nonsensical babble, and
jesters were usually also musical or poetic or acrobatic, and sometimes
all three. Some physical difference from the norm was common whether
it was in being a dwarf or hunchback or in having a gawky or gangly
physique or a loose-limbed agility—his movements might be clumsy
or nimble, but they should be somehow exaggerated or unusual. There
is a Ming dynasty description of a jester that captures this, for
besides always hitting the mark with his gilded tongue, he would "unleash
his body and fling his limbs around, drumming his feet and flapping
his tongue; he was steeped in wisdom." "Capering" is
the word that springs to mind, perhaps a physical reflection of his
verbal agility:
I have seen
Him caper upright, like a wild morisco
Shaking . . . his bells.
The Importance of Being Jest Earnest
But this Will Summers was of an easie nature, and tractable disposition,
who . . . gained not only grace and favour from his Majesty, but a
general love of the Nobility; for he was no carry-tale, nor whisperer,
nor flattering insinuater, to breed discord and dissension, but an
honest plain down-right, that would speak home without halting, and
tell the truth of purpose to shame the Devil; so that his plainness
mixt with a kind of facetiousness, and tartness with pleasantness
made him very acceptable into the companies of all men.
A Pleasant History of the Life and Death of Will Summers (1676)
In short, the King liked him so well, that he did few Things without
Archy's Advice, in so much, that he could have scarce had greater
Power had he been made Regent of the Kingdom.
The Ass Race (1740)
Of at least equal importance with his entertainer's cap was the jester's
function as adviser and critic. This is what distinguishes him from
a pure entertainer who would juggle batons, swallow swords, or strum
on a lute or a clown who would play the fool simply to amuse people.
The jester everywhere employed the same techniques to carry out this
delicate role, and it would take an obtuse king or emperor not to
realize what he was driving at, since "other court functionaries
cooked up the king's facts for him before delivery; the jester delivered
them raw." An informal survey of the man in the street has shown
that most people will pinpoint the jester's right to speak his mind
as one of his salient characteristics. I have encountered only one
person who considers this to have been more myth than reality:
There are many stories which show a jester as the only person who
could counsel a stubborn king, and as such the myth of the court jester
suggests that jesters could act as a check on the whimsical power
of absolute monarchy. . . . I have been engaged in producing and reproducing
a common myth of jesters. Even though the jesters dance right next
to the power of the king, the text has been depoliticized in that
it has effaced the history of the fool, and elaborated on images conjured
up by Erasmus, then Shakespeare, in the task of making jesting reasonable
and responsible, and thus political in modern times. . . . The respected,
responsible, official jesters only functioned in small historical
windows of possibility, for example: fourteenth and fifteenth century
Italy and around the turn of the seventeenth century in England.
Even if the jester's famous veracity were only a myth, it would have
been established long before Erasmus. And we have seen the impressive
extent to which jesters everywhere were allowed and encouraged to
offer counsel and to influence the whims and policies of kings, by
no means being limited to "small historical windows of possibility."
We have seen numerous examples of a jester advising or correcting
his monarch and the recorded instances are particularly abundant in
China. The Chinese records give us an idea of just how effective a
jester could be in tempering the ruler's excesses, for the occasions
when his words of warning were either ignored or punished are heavily
outnumbered by those when he was heeded and even rewarded.
It is in the nature of jesters to speak their minds when the mood
takes them, regardless of the consequences. They are neither calculating
nor circumspect, and this may account for the "foolishness"
often ascribed to them. Jesters are also generally of inferior social
and political status and are rarely in a position (and rarely inclined)
to pose a power threat. They have little to gain by caution and little
to lose by candor—apart from liberty, livelihood, and occasionally
even life, which hardly seems to have been a deterrent. They are peripheral
to the game of politics, and this can reassure a king that their words
are unlikely to be geared to their own advancement. Jesters are not
noted for flattery or fawning. The ruler can be isolated from his
courtiers and ministers, who might conspire against him. The jester
too can be an isolated and peripheral figure somehow detached from
the intrigues of the court, and this enables him to act as a kind
of confidant.
The jester also had humor at his disposal. He could soften the blow
of a critical comment in a way that prevented a dignified personage
from losing face. Humor is the great defuser of tense situations.
Among the Murngin tribe of Australia it is the duty of the clown to
act outrageously, ludicrously imitating a fight if men begin to quarrel.
In making them laugh at him, he distracts their attention from their
own fight and dispels their aggression. Quintilian (ca. 35-100) comments
on the power of jesters' humor to carry the day:
Now, though laughter may be regarded as a trivial matter, and an emotion
frequently awakened by buffoons, actors or fools, it has a certain
imperious force of its own which it is very hard to resist. . . .
It frequently turns the scale in matters of great importance. [Cum
videatur autem res levis et quae ab scurris, mimis, insipientibus
denique saepe moveatur, tamen habet vim nescio an imperiosissimam
et cui repugnari minime potest. . . . Rerum autem saepe . . . maximarum
momenta vertit.]
The foolishness of the jester, whether in his odd appearance or his
levity, implies that he is not passing judgment from on high, and
this may be less galling than the "holier than thou" corrective
of an earnest adviser. One of the most effective techniques the jester
uses to point out his master's folly is allowing him to see it for
himself. Rather than contradicting the king, the jester will agree
with a harebrained scheme so wholeheartedly that the suggestion is
taken to a logical extreme, highlighting its stupidity. The king can
then decide for himself that maybe it wasn't such a good idea after
all.
The jester is in a sense on the side of the ruler. The relationship
was often very close and amiable, and the jester was almost invariably
a cherished rather than a tolerated presence. This leads to the kindliness
of jesters: they could be biting in their attacks, but there is usually
an undercurrent of good-heartedness and understanding to their words.
If they talk the king out of slicing up some innocent, it is not only
to save him from the king's wrath but also to save the king from himself—they
can be the only ones who will tell him he suffers from moral halitosis.
The jester is also perceived as being on the side of the people, the
little man fighting oppression by the powerful. By fooling wisely
("en folastrant sagement"), the jester often won favor among
the people ("gaigna de grace parmy le peuple"). In the folk
perception of southern India a king was hardly considered a king without
his jester, and the continuing appeal of the court jester in India,
in stories and comic books, is perhaps equaled only in Europe. He
may have disappeared from the courts and corridors of power, but he
still has a powerful hold on the collective imagination. Yet he is
no rebel or revolutionary. His detached stance allows him to take
the side of the victim in order to curb the excesses of the system
without ever trying to overthrow it—his purpose is not to replace
one system with another, but to free us from the fetters of all systems:
Under the dissolvent influence of his personality the iron network
of physical, social and moral law, which enmeshes us from the cradle
to the grave, seems—for the moment—negligible as a web
of gossamer. The Fool does not lead a revolt against the Law, he lures
us into a region of the spirit where, as Lamb would put it, the writ
does not run.
In Europe and India the most eminent jesters were household names,
as top-class comedians are today, and stories about their jokes and
tricks circulated freely, as they still do in India—there is
even a kind of lentil soup named after Birbal. The star jesters of
China may also have enjoyed this celebrity status, as Ban Gu's biography
of Dongfang Shuo suggests:
Shuo's jokes and sallies, his divinations and guesses, shallow and
inconsequential though they are, were passed around among the ordinary
run of people, and there was no stripling or cowherd who failed to
be quite dazzled by them.
The court jester made his first appearance in medieval courts around
1202. Whether it was March or April, I'm not sure, but it was 1202.
Jesters were a lot different back then. They didn't have the sort
of nobility that they do now, they were just fools. They did pratfalls,
physical comedy, and other things as well as the classic juggling.
Many were musicians and acrobats as well. Unfortunately, theirs was
not a particularly loved trade, and many jesters were treated badly.
Their currently oh-so-cool clothes came about as a result of patching
together loose bits of cloth just to make something warm to wear.
The jester's lot was not a happy one, and the jester was often the
one beheaded when the king had a bad day.Still, though many jesters
were chosen for their trade because they were a little slow, and thus
perfect scapegoats and victims for whatever, many jesters were extremely
bright, and used their position of never being taken seriously to
make comments abou t their superiors that wouldn't have gone over
well if they weren't jesters. Shakespeare's jesters were extremely
bright, and if you haven't already, I encourage you to check out "King
Lear" and "Twelfth Night", as well as Terry Pratchet's
"Weird Sisters" if you want to see what a jester can be,
even without a juggling act. These jesters spout wordplays and puns
like crazy, sing, dance, do imitations, and talk back to their masters;
having a great time while doing so. However, the jester in "The
Tempest" fits the buffoon description to a tee, so I guess Shakespeare
wasn't too enamored with jesters. Finally, if you have a moment, I
wholeheartedly endorse a fun movie called "The Court Jester,"
starring Danny Kaye, in which the beautiful princess is played by
Angela Lansbury, so I guess it's a bit old. This 1956 film totally
represents everything being a jester is about.
The jester has evolved quite a bit since 1202. He's become a far more
abstract figure. His court has come to stand for a place of mirth
and frivolity, a place to temporarily set aside the trials of life.
There are now just as many jester she's as he's . There are jesters
all over the place too. If you don't believe me, just try to register
for some sort of online service with the nickname "jester."
I'll bet someone's gotten there first. Teenagers all over the country
wear the jester's motley hat, whether they can juggle and sing or
not. Simply being a funny person is reason enough to assume the jester's
mantle. Why so many more jesters than clowns? Could be just etymology,
but most people would agree that the jester has a certain nobility
in his buffoonery that a clown lacks.
The word jester conjures a lot of things to mind. These days, the
image that tends to jump to mind first is an oddly noble, frivolous,
jocular fellow. Due to the sweeping range of his history, the jester
has become extremely abstract, and several different, unique "types"
of jesters have arisen. Here's just a sampler of a few that I've noticed:
The "look,-I-own-a-jester's-hat" Jester: This not necessarily
jocular fellow is best noted for his often out-of-place jester's hat.
Often a teenager, he doesn't necessarily know how to juggle or sing,
and may just wear the hat for the non-standard fashi on statement
it makes, or because he thinks he's funny. Though not "fake"
jesters, there are certainly more sincere jesters out there
The poor-but-wise "Shakespearean" Jester: Notable for their
nonstandard clothes (for a jester), these guys are usually historically
authentic, or at least they try to be. They don't go in for really
gaudy hats or clothes, and aren't necessarily frivolou s either. They
often sing and make subtle humor, so they're not really raucous, but
they do have an admirable authenticity about them
The stereotypical "I'm probably a copyright by now" Jester:
This is the guy with the big goofy grin and hat with bells. He juggles
and wears checkered tights, just like every good jester should. The
"Stussy" shirt corporation is probably trying to get t he
exclusive rights to him as we speak.
The "mystical-warlock-from-beyond" Jester: A purely modern
creation, this jester came into being partly as a result of the jester's
mysterious, noble aura, and partly as a result of the jesters image
being used everywhere, often in fantasy and D&D-style pictures.
Likely from another dimension, this jester wields fantastic and mysterious
magical powers and doesn't do a lot of clowning. It's hard to provide
a solid example, because I probably just made him up. Oh well. This
jester lives in my mind, at least
The "Straight-out-of-Spawn-comics" Jester: A variation of
the mystical jester, this guy is a total glamorization. He has James
Bond refinement, a ridiculous number of points in his hat, and the
ability to juggle obscene numbers of objects. Usually draw with dramatic
perspective, he can do things most jesters only dream of.
The Jesters of Ancient China
The jesters of ancient China are not like the traditional jesters
of medieval Europe who dressed up in jovial clothes whose only purpose
was to entertain and amuse. The jesters of ancient China were men
of great wisdom who would advise the king by way of jest, when the
king may have become angry if told directly of his flaw.
One of these men was Chunyu Kun of Chi who on several occasions advised
King Wei of Chi. One instance was when King Wei had neglected his
duties as monarch for too long, so Chunyu Kun posed a riddle to him
teaching him the error in his ways. Through this simple riddle King
Wei changed from neglecting his kingdom to being a very dutiful king.
He lead his armies out to rid their land of invaders who had come
in because of King Wei's neglect. Another time King Wei requested
that Chunyu Kun go to the Chao to request military aid for the country.
Unfortunately the king did not send sufficient tribute with Chunyu
Kun to gain the favor with the Chao. Chunyu Kun wanted to help his
liege see the error in his ways. So Chunyu Kun told King Wei a story
about a man who desired a huge gift from the gods but was only offering
a small token to them in return. This helped King Wei see the error
in his ways and he sent a large gift to the Chao instead. Chunyu Kun
also helped King Wei see the error in his nightly drinking by telling
a story to illustrate the "ill effects of all excess."
Another jester of ancient China, named Meng, advised King Chuang of
Chu on many occasions. In one story, King Chuang wanted to have his
favorite horse buried with all the honors of a high official and decreed
that, "The next man to remonstrate on the subject of the horse
will be put to death." To help the king see the flaw in his logic,
Meng took an extreme positon. Meng proposed that King Chuang not only
bury the horse with the honors of a high official but have the horse
be buried with the honors fitting a king. This helped the king see
that others would see him as "[thinking] little of men but very
highly of horses," so he changed his mind and had the dead horse
disposed of as all other livestock. He also helped King Chuang see
the error in his policies in rewarding his diligent hard working ministers.
His did this through a song telling how dishonest officials die wealthy,
leaving their families much land and money, while an honest one died
leaving his family next to nothing. As a result of Meng's song King
Chuang changed his policies and began rewarding his good officials
well.
The final jester mentioned in this chapter was a man named Chan of
the Chin Dynasty. He once attended a party held by the First Emperor
of Chin and in was raining while the guards were on duty out in the
rain. Chan by means of a joke helped the emperor to see that he could
cut the number of guards in half and still have plenty. He also helped
the emperor see the flaw in making strategic passes in the empire
into parks with only animals to guard them. He also helped the emperor
see that lacquering the palace, though beautiful, was simply impractical.
Thus we see the usefulness of the jesters in helping their sovereign
see some of the flaws that may have otherwise gone unnoticed. In the
words of the Grand Historian: 'When Chunyu Kun leaned back and laughed,
King Wei of Chi became a mighty monarch. When Meng shook his head
and sang, a firewood vendor was enfeoffed. When Chan called down from
the balustrade, the guard was reduced by half. Isn't that splendid!'
|